<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taxation of Carried Interest – The Debate Continues as Legislation Looms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rroyselaw.com/blog1/index.php/2010/01/07/taxation-of-carried-interest-%e2%80%93-the-debate-continues-as-legislation-looms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rroyselaw.com/blog1/2010/01/07/taxation-of-carried-interest-%e2%80%93-the-debate-continues-as-legislation-looms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:44:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://rroyselaw.com/blog1/2010/01/07/taxation-of-carried-interest-%e2%80%93-the-debate-continues-as-legislation-looms/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rroyselaw.com/blog1/?p=17#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>Doug - this is more policy driven than logical. The right answer as an economic matter is that the compensatory portion should be taxed. It is just a matter of time before we get there as a legislative matter.

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug &#8211; this is more policy driven than logical. The right answer as an economic matter is that the compensatory portion should be taxed. It is just a matter of time before we get there as a legislative matter.</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Park</title>
		<link>http://rroyselaw.com/blog1/2010/01/07/taxation-of-carried-interest-%e2%80%93-the-debate-continues-as-legislation-looms/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rroyselaw.com/blog1/?p=17#comment-5</guid>
		<description>If substance over form dictates the result, then ordinary income treatment may be the more logical outcome.

Where you come down Roger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If substance over form dictates the result, then ordinary income treatment may be the more logical outcome.</p>
<p>Where you come down Roger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.197 seconds -->

